I recently had a discussion with someone close to me about why exactly I fell from grace- that is, why I found myself no longer able to believe in God or Mormonism. I had explained this issue to her before but I still felt that she didn’t really understand my position. Granted, it’s hard to understand what it’s like to lose your faith unless you’ve gone through it. Nonetheless, I’ll try to give you the tl;dr version of it. I spent 10 years believing in a God that I later realized simply doesn’t exist. I started really believing in God because I found that when I payed, prayed and obeyed, everything worked out really well. I realize now that the God I believed in was comprised of 1) a consistent, effective routine 2) an excellent support system and 3) luck.
I also used to believe in the Holy Ghost. I believed that my feelings could tell me what I needed to do and that if those feelings were telling me to do “good” or “Mormon” things, that it was definitely inspiration from heaven. I realize now that much of the time I was simply practicing mindfulness and regulating the emotion of elevation. I don’t deny that sometimes I experience feelings of transcendence that I can’t explain. But just because I feel “the spirit” while I listen to Tchaikovsky’s Romeo and Juliet Overture doesn’t mean it’s true. And having felt the emotion of elevation while practicing mindfulness while reading the Book of Mormon doesn’t mean that I have to make excuses for all the anachronisms and other problems in the Book of Mormon.
More than one of my family members has challenged my relationship to Jesus. The truth is, as a believing Mormon, my connection to Jesus was more of an incidental one than something fundamental to my belief. What was really important for me was the Holy Ghost. It always made sense to me that as a mere mortal, I didn’t have direct access to the Father or the Son, so I had to use the middle man like everybody else. Only now, as I’ve spent several months working for a non-denominational Christian church, do I realize that Mormons claim to be the most Christ-centered church without real evidence to support their claim. In other churches, Jesus is all they talk about. They spend their sermons and dollars focused on doing what they believe Christ would do if he was on their committees and boards. Contrast this with Mormonism where we talk about stuff like how families are forever if you pay/pray/obey and how you need to get a testimony of the Book of Mormon and Joseph Smith and be prepared to make excuses for all of the problems with both of them. It’s much harder to find fault with Jesus’ character and actions than it is to defend the historicity and anachronisms of the Book of Mormon. And I won’t even begin to try and defend Joseph Smith. And yet, I’m not convinced Jesus was divine. I suppose I consider him a prophet and a cool philosopher. But I don’t believe that There Is Power In The Blood.
The greatest weakness in any testimony I used to have is that I never had anything to compare with. Of course Mormonism seems true when it’s the only church you’ve ever attended. Of course Mormonism seems true when all of your friends and family for generations tell you that it is and get you baptized when you’re a kid. Of course Mormonism seems true when you spend two years telling people the same. It just doesn’t seem true when following Mormonism as an adult yields a different result than it did as a kid. At first, I didn’t choose to stop believing in Mormonism. At the beginning of my faith crisis, I didn’t choose to stop believing in anything. I simply realized that much of what I believed in previously didn’t exist at all. My God didn’t exist; the Joseph Smith I knew didn’t exist; the Holy Ghost I had communed with daily didn’t exist and frankly, the divinely-led church I believed in was nowhere to be found upon the face of the earth. The Mormon church does exist and the Book of Mormon does exist. The church does have so-called prophets and apostles today and there was a guy named Joseph Smith who was ironically more prophetic (albeit erroneously) than most of his successors. But none of these things are what they seemed to be. After a while I realized that the vast majority of what I believed in before didn’t exist. That is when I stopped trying to believe.
The difference between post-Mormons and believing Mormons is not necessarily a difference in knowledge (it can be, but not always). A true believing Mormon will (almost invariably) defend the church, its doctrine and history without hesitation. Post-Mormons don’t have the energy or motivation to do so. Once your kid figures out that Mommy and Daddy are really Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, what’s the point of continuing to lie to your kid?